Intel 865PE 4 way shootout (7)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Intel 865PE Springdale boards 4 way shootout (7)
Bluetooth 21 May 2003

Benchmarking

In Windows Movie Maker ver 2, we imported the sample file that comes with the program into it and encode it using a 1.5Mbps video WMV. Here are the timings recorded using a stop watch. From the timings, we can see that Dual Channel i865PE and i875 is definitely more superior by 12.5% against the unofficial 800mhz supporting 845PE chipset. Timings recorded in seconds (the faster the better). There is little difference between Canterwood (i875P)and the Springdale (i865PE) benchmarks.

In terms of rendering, lightwave 3.0 is used. We used the benchmark file Radio-reflective things and rendered one frame. Here are the timings recorded in seconds (the faster the better). This seems more consistent and Springdale (i865PE) boards are generally slower than Canterwood (i875P) boards by half a second or so.

Conclusion