Sandra XII
Benchmarks of AMD Phenom GP-9600 on Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
Bluetooth 16 Nov 2007
Benchmarks
The
3 different boards are put to the test comparing the two AMD 700 series boards
running a Phenom GP-9600 at 2.3GHz versus an underclocked QX6700 running on our
GA-P35T-DQ6. For the Jetway board, the DDR2 is set to run at DDR2-800 as that is
the only available option. As for the Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6, it is set to run
at DDR2-1066, both runs the same Kingston DDR2-1066 at CAS 5, 5-5-18, 2T. The
Gigabyte P35T-DQ6 running an underclocked QX6700 is with a pair of Samsung
DDR3-1066 at 1066MHz CAS 7-7-7-20, 2T.
Sandra XII tests
From the chart, we tested the Arithmetic and
multimedia performance of the CPU. As the speed on the two AMD boards are at
200.0MHz and 200.9MHz, we would expect some minor differences in scores.
We did a clock to clock comparison by underclocking
the QX6700 to 230X10 (2.3GHz). In Arithmetic tests, the iSSE3 instruction
set seems to be on par whereas in Drystone ALU computation, AMD Phenom falls
behind the Intel Quad core processor by around 23%.
In terms of multimedia, Intel quad core still leads
the way especially in Int x8 iSSE3 tests by almost 188%. In Floating iSSE2, the
difference is 20%.
Sandra XII |
Gigabyte P35T-DQ6 (QX6700 at 230x10) |
Jetway
PA77GTA-VT (Phenom GP-9600) |
Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6 (Phenom GP-9600) |
|
|
|
|
Memory Bandwidth |
4795/4782 |
5521/5502 |
5668/5684 |
Arithmetic - Drystone ALU |
42274 |
34242 |
34635 |
Arithmetic - Whetstone iSSE3 |
29231 |
29732 |
29852 |
Multimedia - Int x8 iSSE3 |
253901 |
87962 |
87948 |
Multimedia - Float x4 iSSE2 |
138222 |
115052 |
114556 |
Next >>>
|