Chaintech VNF3-250 Mainboard Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Chaintech VNF3-250 NF3-250 Mainboard Review (4)
Gortok 8 May 2004

So, we're left with "what's 100% stable"?? THAT is ongoing...Since we've determined the CPU will run at 248, and the RAM certainly won't, it'll take time to find the happy medium. The virtually locked multiplier only limits the possibilities some. My RAM however limits anything over 218-220. The Asynchonous 248-207 settings show to have the best performance, but are they stable? What IS stable??

SuprPi 32M proves a system is stable...

Next >>>