SOYO K8USA ALi/ULi M1687 Athlon 64 Mainboard Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SOYO K8USA Dragon Ultra Athlon 64 ALi M1687 Mainboard Review (4)
Bluetooth 2 Dec 2003

Benchmarking

We check out the results for ZD Benchmarks using CC Winstone 2002 and Business Winstone 2001 in this section of the benchmark tests.

On The K7 series of boards, SiS boards always seem to have better throughput when it comes to disk access and this resulted in better overall performance in CCWS and BWS.

In CCWS 2002, we see that BIOSTAR K8VHA Pro scores 45.2 & Gigabyte K8VNXP scores 46.2 which is slower than the ALi ref board of 51.3 and the nF3 board score of 50.8. The IDEQ 200P scores 47 which is similar to the Gigabyte K8NNXP. The slightly lower score could be due to the lower FSB of 199.5MHz. ALi and NF3 leads by around 10% over the VIA K8T800 boards. ASUS K8V Deluxe, ABIT KV8-Max3 performs similar to the Gigabyte K8VNXP scoring a higher 46.6 points. SOYO K8USA shows a slightly better performance compared to the ALi Ref Board! MCWS2003 scores 43.1

On Business Winstone 2001,the SOYO K8USA Dragon Ultra scores 88.7 which is 0.6 points higher than the ALI ref board. This is a good indicator that the retail board is even better in performance. Would this be due to a 0.4MHz difference. Well it is up to you to see for yourself.

Next >>>