SiS 748 Ref Board Review (4a)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SiS 748 Ref Mainboard Review (4a)
Bluetooth 2 June 2003

Benchmarking

On Page 4, we investigated the CCWS 2002 and BWS 2001 results. A number of users requested that we compare the differences in IDE performance.

We used HD-TACH to measure the Read Throughput.

EPoX 8RDA3+ (nForce2)

According to the log file, the following is registered.

Burst speed: 92525kps
Average read speed: 35242

SIS 748 Reference board

Burst speed: 102870kps
Average read speed: 35242

The SiS 748 IDE performance is definitely much better than the nForce2 not only in Read speed, max, min and average readings. The burst speed of Burst speed: 102870kps surpasses that of nForce2 (92525kps). This is probably one important aspect of SiS 748 which shows a 11.18% difference between the two chipsets. It also confirms why CCWS and BWS which heavily relies on Disk Performance to surpass that of nForce2.

Next