SiS 648FX Ref Board Review (6)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SiS 648FX Ref Mainboard Review (6)
Bluetooth 23 May 2003

Benchmarking

In Comanche 4 benchmarks, the performance of the Canterwood boards are all within 1 fps which is not very apparent. The Springdale (i865PE) boards does show a slight difference of 1-2fps slower than most Canterwood (i875P boards). The Springdale (i865PE) is not much faster than the SiS 648FX reference board.

On CodeCreatures Benchmark pro, there is practically not much difference in this benchmark. The difference among the boards is merely a difference of 0.1. The results are quite consistent throughout.

Next