AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800) Part 5
Bluetooth 29 Apr 2003

Benchmarking

We checked out Q3 running Demo001 at 1024x768x32 Hi-Quality. Although both the AMD and Intel platform are Dual Channel DDR400 capable, we see that the performance of the AXP 3000+ on the EPoX 8RDA3+ is not really that impressive as we thought. It scores 323 which is close to what my AXP 2400+ does.

In 3DMark2001SE, again the p4 3.0G on Canterwood seems to be ahead of the AXP3000+ on nForce2 SPP.

In 3Dmark2003, the difference is not as apparent but we can see that it is slightly slower.

Next