AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800) Part 6
Bluetooth 29 Apr 2003

Benchmarking

In Comanche 4 benchmarks, the performance of the AXP3000+ Barton 400 is way below by a difference of 8 fps compared to the P4 3.0G processor on Canterwood boards. In fact, the score of 54fps is slightly better than a P4 2.4G running 533mhz bus speed.

On CodeCreatures Benchmark pro, there is practically not much difference in this benchmark. Hmm, looks like the AXP 3000+ although rated at 2100Mhz is pretty good too.

Next