AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) vs Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800) Part 4
Bluetooth 29 Apr 2003

Benchmarking

We check out the results for ZD Benchmarks using CC Winstone 2002 and Business Winstone 2001 in this section of the benchmark.

Please take note that there is no IAA available at the time of review for the Canterwood boards. The current IAA downloaded from Intel site can't be installed for Canterwood boards. We have received news that a IAA is being planned for it for IDE. The current edition of IAA is meant for SATA RAID.

It is interesting to see that the AXP 3000+ actually outperforms the Pentium 4 3.0G in Content Creation WS 2002 by 3%. Pretty fast I could say.

On Business Winstone 2001, the same thing happens. It lost to an overclocked BH7 running the P4 3.0G 800 processor on i845PE and it has IAA installed. If the Canterwood boards are installed with the new IAA drivers, it could have probably overtook the BH7.

Next