BIOSTAR P4TCAPro i875 Canterwood Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

BIOSTAR P4TCA Pro i875 Canterwood Review (4)
Bluetooth 13 May 2003

Benchmarking

We check out the results for ZD Benchmarks using CC Winstone 2002 and Business Winstone 2001 in this section of the benchmark.

Please take note that there is no IAA available for this new chipset and the current IAA downloaded from Intel site can't be installed for Canterwood boards. We have received news that a IAA is being planned for it for IDE. The current edition of IAA is meant for SATA RAID.

Again, we see that the Canterwood boards performs almost identical and the only thing that differs is the difference between them and the i845PE and AMD EPox 8RDA3+ boards.

On Business Winstone 2001, it seems that IAA on the ABIT BH7 speeds things up. All Canterwood boards performs at around 70 marks which is 10 marks slower on the average. Hopefully a new IAA for Canterwood IDE will boost the performance upwards.

Next