Gigabyte P35-DQ6 (Intel P35) mainboard review

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Gigabyte P35-DQ6 (Intel P35) mainboard review - 3DMark06
Bluetooth 8 may 2007

Benchmarks - 3Dmark2006

Futuremark's 3Dmark 2006 is ran with the ASUS EN7900GT graphics card with Forceware 91.31. Below are the result break down.

In this test, we see that the P35-DQ6 exhibits very good performance. Scoring 5552 and 5558, it seems that the extra bandwidth does not affect the results by a lot. The score is also on par with the nV 680i boards. In fact, the score is similar to the GA-965P-DQ6. In the breakdown of the scores for CPU, HDR etc, we can see that the P35-DQ6 is indeed faster than the rest of the boards.

With a check in the CPU score, we can see that the Intel QX6700 score much better than the Intel X6800. A big difference of 54% is registered.

For Gigabyte P35-DQ6                       Scrore is 5558, SM2: 2078, HDR/SM3 :2046, CPU Score : 3982
For ASUS Striker Extreme+QX6700,     Score is 5552,   SM2 : 2080, HDR/SM3: 2046, CPU Score : 3918
For ECS PN2 SLI2+ + QX6700,            Score is 5549, SM2: 2080, HDR/SM3: 2044, CPU Score : 3916
For Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6+QX6700, Score is 5559, SM2: 2077, HDR/SM3: 2050, CPU Score : 3957
For Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6+X6800,    Score is 5323, SM2: 2086, HDR/SM3: 2048, CPU Score : 2568
For 4CoreDual-VSTA+QX6700 (DDR2), Score is 5167, SM2: 1965, HDR/SM3: 1843, CPU Score : 4010
For 4CoreDual-VSTA+QX6700 (DDR),   Score is 5154, SM2: 1964, HDR/SM3: 1842, CPU Score : 3914

Discuss in Forum

Next >>>