Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H (AMD 690G) mainboard review - Futuremark 3Dmark05/3Dmark06 Benchmarks @OCWORKBENCH

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H (AMD 690G) mainboard review - Futuremark 3Dmark05/3Dmark06 Benchmarks
Bluetooth 22 May 2007

Benchmarks - 3DMark2005/2006

Using Catalyst 7.4, we tested the board and it scored 1065. Apparently, Cat 7.4 did not bring a major improvement in 3Dmark06 scores. If we look at ASUS M2A-VM HDMI which uses Catalyst 7.3, it scored 1071. Older boards using Catalyst 7.2 (7.33) only get around 1040 odd points in this test.

As we can see, hthe NVIDIA 7050PV-630A is no match for it

In 3Dmark06, the ECS AMD690GM-M2 scored 307 marks. That is comparable to the ALiveNF4G-DVI board based on NF6100+410. The EPoX AT690 pro scored 311, slightly higher by 4 points.

Comparing the ECS RS485M-M of 168 points versus 311 points obtained using the EPoX board, we see a jump of ~85%.

Our Gigbayte GA-MA69G-S3H scored 313 using Catalyst 7.4. That is just a few points higher than the other AMD 690G boards.

The results shows that integrated graphics are not really meant for 3D demanding games. In fact, in the next few pages, we will skip all tests of 3D games using the integrated graphics as all of them will not gartner even 5 fps in games like Riddick, DOOM3 etc.

Next >>>