BIOSTAR TF7050-M2
7050-630A mainboard review
-
Futuremark
3Dmark05/3Dmark06
Benchmarks
Bluetooth 24 Jun 2007
Benchmarks - 3DMark2005/2006
When
it comes to 3Dmark05 test, the AMD 690G boards perform better throughout. We can
see from the chart that the 7050-630a all scored around 800 points. As we have
mentioned before, the Jetway and EPoX board came default with an o/c GPU CLK,
this gave them a better score.
With its default GPU CLK of 425MHz, the board scored 793 points which is
similar the ASRock board. The other two boards tested has both the GPU Clk
raised beyond the 425MHz mark, that resulted in a skew result. In fact, if the
GPU CLK can be tuned to 525MHz, it would be able to attained a score of
900points.
In 3Dmark06, the ECS AMD690GM-M2
scored 307 marks. That is comparable to the ALiveNF4G-DVI board based on
NF6100+410. The EPoX AT690 pro scored 311,
slightly higher by 4 points.
Comparing the ECS RS485M-M of 168
points versus 311 points obtained using the EPoX board, we see a jump of ~85%.
Our Gigbayte GA-MA69G-S3H scored 313 using Catalyst 7.4. That is just a
few points higher than the other AMD 690G boards.
The system driver 14.10 we used comes with a
display driver. BIOSTAR TF7050-M2 scored 293 points in this test with its
default GPU CLK of 425MHz. The two others with overclocked GPU Clks scored 330
and 303 respectively. The score is 3 points behind the ASRock. Based on the
previous tests, it should be able to attain 334 points for if we are able
to o/c the GPU CLK to 525MHz.
The results shows that integrated
graphics are not really meant for 3D demanding games. In fact, in the next few
pages, we will skip all tests of 3D games using the integrated graphics as all
of them will not gartner even 5 fps in games like Riddick, DOOM3 etc with "high
settings" in game
Next >>>
Discuss in Forum
| 