OCWorkbench - ASRock ALiveNF4G-DVI AM2 board (NF6100) Benchmarks 4/8

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ASRock ALiveNF4G-DVI AM2 board (NF6100) Review Benchmark 4/8
Bluetooth 8 Aug 2006

Benchmarks - 3DMark2005/2006

We paired up a ASUS 7600GT with both board and loaded them with Forceware 84.21. With the integrated graphics on board, it got a score of only 694 Marks. That is lower than our Conroe945G-DVI system with a X6800 scoring 851 marks. Compared to the AM2NF6G-VSTA which scored only 620, it look like this older chipset does perform better.

With a 7600GT attached at its PCIe interface, the board scored 5973 which is almost the same as most of the other boards in the same league.

In 3Dmark06, again with integrated video, it scored 302 vs a score of 273 we have for our Conroe945G-DVI board with a X6800. With an external 7600GT card, the score seems to be on par with its big brothers. This is largely due to the fact that 3Dmark06 score is highly determined by the CPU (e.g. a dual core will give substantially better results than a single core). On the other hand, 3Dmark05 is more GPU intensive.

Next >>>