ULi M1689 Socket 754 Reference Board Review 5/8 (OCWORKBENCH.COM)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ULi M1689 Socket 754 Reference Board Review 5/8
Bluetooth 22 Aug 2004

Benchmarks - Q3

It is kind of strange that in Quake 3, we see a mixed results. ULi M1689 seems to be slightly slower in this test. We did noticed that ULi performs slightly slower in OpenGL programs. We will see if future AGP drivers will help that.

Discuss in Forum

Next >>>