Tul Powercolor X600XT PCIe graphics card (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Powercolor X600XT PCIe Graphics Card (4)
Bluetooth 28 Sep 2004

Test Environment

Intel P4 3.6E
ASUS K8V Deluxe
2 x 512M Corsair CMX512-3200XL running CAS 2, 5-2-2
Powercolor X600XT PCIe
Seagate Barracuda V SATA 80G
Catalyst 4.8 (6.14.0010.6467)

The Quake 3 demo001 running at 1024x768x32 is tested and the results are 306.7 and 328.5fps at default. That is somewhat the score of a Radeon 9700pro running with P4 3.0C at aggressive timings. Do take note that we are using a P4 3.6E and that has more or less some effect on the scores.

Next >>>