[OCWORKBENCH.COM] ASrock K8 Upgrade-760GX SiS 760GX Socket 754/939 Review part 1 (S754) 4/7

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ASrock K8 Upgrade-760GX SiS 760GX Socket 754/939 Review part 1 (S754) 4/7
Bluetooth 14 Sep 2004

Benchmarks - 3Dmark2001SE/3DMark2003

Using the Gigabyte Radeon 9700Pro graphics card, we ran 3DMark2001SE and 2003. The ASrock K8 Combo-Z scored 17442 which is exactly the score our ref 755 board scored. From the charts, we can see that the SiS 760GX does perform pretty good.

Using the onboard AGP, it scored 2162 and 218 for 3Dmark2001SE and 3Dmark2003 respectively. As the board uses 760GX chipset which is based on UMA architecture, the performance is not as good as the Gigabyte K8S760M which uses dedicated memory (LFB-local frame buffer) on the PCB.

In 3Dmark2003, the board performs well compared to most of the boarsd based on various chipsets. Again we see the scores are very close to the SiS ref board. Some of the other boards that scored higher had their FSB running at above 200.00.

Discuss in Forum

Next >>>