SiS 755 Athlon 64 Socket 754 Mainboard Review (6)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SiS 755 Athlon 64 Socket 754 Mainboard Review (6)
Bluetooth 20 Oct 2003

Benchmarking

In Comanche 4 benchmarks, the differences between among the K7 boards are minimal. When we tested the same benchmark on the ALi M1687, we get 67.31 versus 67fps on the ALi Ref board. The iDEQ 200P again reigns in this category with a high of 67.59. SiS 755 Ref does not seem to perform best in Comanche 4 tests but it is not too far off among all the boards. Looks like the nF3 and VIA boards have very good performance in Comanche 4.

In AquaMark3, both SiS 755 and BIOSTAR K8VHA Pro scores the same. The difference among the boards are not too far off from one another.

Next >>>