SiS 655FX Ref Board Review (5)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SIS 655FX Ref Board Review (5)
Bluetooth 30 Sept 2003

Benchmarking

We checked out Q3 running Demo001 at 1024x768x32 Hi-Quality. The SIS 655FX Ref board performs pretty well at a high of 371.3 fps. That is very close to what the ASUS P4P800 can obtained.

In 3Dmark2001SE, again we see that the score of 16534 which is just a 200 points difference from the top performers. In fact, if you think of it, it performs better than most of the Springdale and Canterwood today except those Springdales with hacked PAT.

In 3DMark2003, the difference isn't that far off either. If you intend to purchase a Springdale/Canterwood board, then you should seriously give it a good consideration.

Next