BIOSTAR P4TCAPro i875 Canterwood Review (6)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

BIOSTAR P4TCA Pro i875 Canterwood Review (6)
Bluetooth 13 May 2003

Benchmarking

In Comanche 4 benchmarks, the performance of the Canterwood boards are all within 1 fps which is not very apparent. Again we see that the difference between the ICH5 and ICH5R boards does show a slight difference in performance.

On CodeCreatures Benchmark pro, there is practically not much difference in this benchmark. The difference among the boards is merely a difference of 0.1. The results are quite consistent throughout.

Next