BIOSTAR iDEQ200P nF3 150 SFF Barebone Review (6)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

BIOSTAR iDEQ200P nF3 150 SFF Barebone Review (6)
Bluetooth 9 Oct 2003

Benchmarking

In Comanche 4 benchmarks, the differences between among the K7 boards are minimal. When we tested the same benchmark on the ALi M1687, we get 67.31 versus 67fps on the ALi Ref board. The iDEQ 200P again reigns in this categor with a high of 67.59. Looks like the nF3 and VIA boards have very good performance in Comanche 4.

In AquaMark3, we see that the VIA based K8VHAPro scores the top among all the boards. With a slower FSB, the iDEQ 200P is last among the boards. We would expect the iDEQ 200P to be around the levels of the Gigabyte NF3 if the FSB is exactly 200.00MHz.

Next >>>