BIOSTAR iDEQ200P nF3 150 SFF Barebone Review (3)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

BIOSTAR iDEQ200P nF3 150 SFF Barebone Review (3)
Bluetooth 9 Oct 2003

Benchmarking

Before we benchmark, we document the FSB the board is running at. The SiS 748 reference board is a bit on the high side. Do bear that in mind when comparing results of the boards as a higher FSB usually will impact the benchmarks in one way or another. ASrock K7S8X-E is registered at 200.97MHz and the EPoX 8RDA3+ is at 200.46 MHz. Gigabyte 7NNXP runs at 200.45MHz and DFI is at 200.47. Gigabyte 7VT600-1394 is at 200.9Mhz, DFI 748-AL is at a very exact 200.45MHz. The M1687 Reference Board runs exactly at 200.00MHz FSB. Gigabyte K8NNXP runs at 201 (old BIOS with 3100+) and 200MHz (new BIOS with 3200+). GA-K8VNXP also runs at 200.00MHz FSB and Biostar K8VHA Pro runs at 200.4MHz, a bit higher than most boards. The iDEQ200P runs at 199.5MHz which is half a megahertz lower. Will that affect the overall results. We shall see.

In the comparison, DFI 748-AL, ASRock K7S8X-E and SiS 748 Reference board is running 1 x 512M Corsair XMS3500C2 Stick at CAS 2, 5-2-2. The Gigabyte 7VT600-1394 runs CAS 2, 6-2-2. EPoX 8RDA3+ is running 2 x 256M Corsair TWINX512-2700LLPT at CAS 2, 5-2-2.

Although the memory controller embedded within the CPU. The memory benchmark scores still varies base on the patches and errata made to the BIOS.The iDEQ200P scores 3075/3075. Considering that it is running at 199.5MHz, it is a pretty good result.

Next >>>