ABIT IC7-G Canterwood 875P Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ABIT IC7-G Canterwood 875P Review (4)
Bluetooth 4 June 2003

Benchmarking

We check out the results for ZD Benchmarks using CC Winstone 2002 and Business Winstone 2001 in this section of the benchmark.

Please take note that there is no IAA available for this new chipset and the current IAA downloaded from Intel site can't be installed for Springdale boards. We have received news that a IAA is being planned for it for IDE. The current edition of IAA is meant for SATA RAID.

Before you read the graphs, we have to explain the colour codes.

White : nForce2 chipset, AXP3000+, CAS2, 5-2-2 (AMD platform)
Blue : Intel 865PE chipset, P4 3.0C, CAS2, 5-2-2 (Intel platform)
Red : Intel 875P chipset, P4 3.0C, CAS2, 5-2-2 (Intel platform)
Green: Intel 845PE chipset, P4 3.0C, CAS2, 5-2-2 (Intel platform)

Again, we see that the bars in Red which are the Canterwood boards. From the chart, it is not difficult to see that ABIT IC7-G performs almost the same as most of the Canterwood boards tested. ABIT's own BH7 scores 42.8 and we can see the beauty of Canterwood (875P) as a workstation solution.

On Business Winstone 2001, it seems that IAA on the ABIT BH7 speeds things up. All Springdale/Canterwood boards performs at around 70 marks which is 10 marks slower on the average. Hopefully a new IAA for Canterwood IDE will boost the performance upwards.

Next