MSI GF4 Ti4600 (1) 13 Mar 2002

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

MSI GF4 Ti4600 Review (1)
Overclocker 13 Mar 2002

Benchmarking

We conduct the a number of tests on the setup with the following configuration :

Test System:

Intel Pentium 4 1.5G Engineering Sample
ECS L4S5A SiS645 mainboard running 100/166 async mode
IBM 15G 7200RPM ATA100 HD
AOPEN 40X CDROM
MSI Geforce4 Ti5700 Graphics card w/Detonator driver 27.20
ATi 8500 w/4.13.9017
Nanya DDR333 256MB DDR
Channelwell 375W AMD Approved PSU

Update : The graphics card used in the comparison is a 8500 Radeon and not a 8500 RadeonLE as indicated in the graph.

Quake 3 Demo 1

Quake3 is probably the one of the most important software to be used for testing graphics cards. In our test, we ran the test at least 3 times to obtain a stable sustained result. In our chart, we compared the GF4 Ti4600 against an ATi Radeon8500. We can see that the results of MSI are exceptionally impressive at high resolutions. At 800x600x32, the difference is 2%. At 1280x1024x32 MSI GF4 Ti4600 lead by around 18%.