Gigabyte ATi Radeon8500 AP64D-H Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Gigabyte ATi Radeon8500 AP64D-H Review (4)
Overclocker 18 Mar 2002

Benchmarking

We conduct the a number of tests on the setup with the following configuration :

Test System:

Intel Pentium 4 1.5G Engineering Sample
ECS L4S5A SiS645 mainboard running 100/166 async mode
IBM 15G 7200RPM ATA100 HD
AOPEN 40X CDROM
MSI Geforce4 Ti5700 Graphics card w/Detonator driver 27.20
ATi 8500 w/4.13.9017
Nanya DDR333 256MB DDR
Channelwell 375W AMD Approved PSU

3DMark2001SE

Lastly, we take a look at the benchmarks of 3DMark2001SE in comparison with the nvidia cards. There is no doubt that the GF4 Ti4600 is ahead, but when we pushed the memory timings to 310/310, we can see the the results are drawing closer. The GF3 Ti200 128MB falls way behind the Kings by 26% ~ 66%.