Gigabyte 7VAXP KT400 Review (5)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

Gigabyte 7VAXP KT400 Review (5)
Overclocker 24 Aug 2002

<A target="_top" HREF="http://www.burstnet.com/ads/ad5180a- map.cgi/CACHEBUSTING_NUMBER"> <IMG SRC="http://www.burstnet.com/cgi- bin/ads/ad5180a.cgi/CACHEBUSTING_NUMBER"> border="0" width="468" height="60" alt="Please support our sponsor."> </A>

Benchmarking

We conduct the usual tests on the setup with the following configuration :

Test System:

AMD AthlonXP 1500+ and Thermoengine heatsink/fan
Maxtor 40G 7200RPM ATA133 HD
AOPEN 40X CDROM
MSI Geforce3 Ti200 Graphics card
TwinMos DDR400 256MB DDR
Channelwell 375W AMD Approved PSU

Quake3 Arena results

Further investigation was done based on two popular gaming software Quake3 Arena. We run Q3 for 5 times and take the most consistent result. We benchmark the board using a MSI Geforce3 Ti200 graphics card with the detonator 21.83 drivers. Have a close look at the results and see how fast the 7vaxp can deliver.

*Q3 results are recorded based on Fastest (512x384x16bots) and Hi-Quality (800x600x32bits)

Q3 Demo001 High Quality gives a result of 210 ~ 211. in the high quality mode. In the Fastest mode, it seems to perform slightly better than the KT333 boards. Well what I can say is that the KT400 boards don't seem to have a big improvement over the KT333 boards.