AX4R Plus Granite Bay Dual Channel DDR Board Review (6)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

AOPEN AX4R Plus Granite Bay Dual Channel DDR Board Review (6)
Bluetooth 11 Dec 2002

Benchmarking

A score of 50.07 makes it king of comanche in our comparison chart below. It is the first board that makes it to 50fps. Comanche 4 is more of a CPU intensive program than graphics intensive. From the results, we can see that the AOPEN AX4R Plus is somehow faster in that sense. Would the shortened traces helped since the chipset is placed 45 deg rotated. I will leave it to you to decide.

On CodeCreatures Benchmark pro, which is more graphics intensive seems to perform average among the boards tested. The AX4R Plus seems to lag and only scored 22 fps.